Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains the materials created or collected by Siminoski in the course of analyzing the documents released to him by the FBI. The FBI was required to deliver to Siminoski a "Vaughn Index" to the documents it released, identifying each document, indicating the statutory exemption (for redaction or withdrawal) claimed, and explaining how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption. The subseries contains two versions of this index, both incomplete....

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains materials from the files of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, which represented Siminoski in his lawsuit against the FBI. The bulk of the documents--Siminoski's memoranda to Joan Howarth of February-June 1986, his "Searchability memo" of June 1986, and the three draft memoranda prepared by ACLU lawyers or paralegals (box 15, folders 8-12; box 16, folder 1)--all relate to the plaintiff's proposed statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law,...

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains materials from the files of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, which represented Siminoski in his lawsuit against the FBI. The bulk of the documents--Siminoski's memoranda to Joan Howarth of February-June 1986, his "Searchability memo" of June 1986, and the three draft memoranda prepared by ACLU lawyers or paralegals (box 15, folders 8-12; box 16, folder 1)--all relate to the plaintiff's proposed statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law,...

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains materials from the files of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, which represented Siminoski in his lawsuit against the FBI. The bulk of the documents--Siminoski's memoranda to Joan Howarth of February-June 1986, his "Searchability memo" of June 1986, and the three draft memoranda prepared by ACLU lawyers or paralegals (box 15, folders 8-12; box 16, folder 1)--all relate to the plaintiff's proposed statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law,...

Subseries Scope and Content From the Sub-Series: This subseries contains materials from the files of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, which represented Siminoski in his lawsuit against the FBI. The bulk of the documents--Siminoski's memoranda to Joan Howarth of February-June 1986, his "Searchability memo" of June 1986, and the three draft memoranda prepared by ACLU lawyers or paralegals (box 15, folders 8-12; box 16, folder 1)--all relate to the plaintiff's proposed statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law,...