Box 22
Contains 65 Results:
Warren H. Mace, plaintiff and respondent, vs. Edward Merrill, defendant and appellant, 1877
Respondent's points and authorities, Hartman & Haley, attorneys for plaintiff and respondent, no. 5691 in the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Edward Dupuy, plaintiff and respondent, vs. Edward Merrill, defendant and appellant, 1878
Papers used on the hearing of motion to vacate judgment, J. S. Chapman and Henry Hancock, attorneys for appellant, H. T. Hazard, attorney for respondent, in the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Henry Hancock, plaintiff and respondent, vs. Pio Pico, defendant and appellant, 1870
Transcript on appeal from the 17th district court, Los Angeles County, W. A. Cornwall and Chas. H. Larrabbe, attorneys for respondent, Glassell, Chapman & Smith, attorneys for appellant, in the Supreme Court of the State of California, published in San Francisco.
Henry Hancock vs. William Wolfskill, 1868
Affidavit of Henry Hancock, in the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Thomas Jeffreys, plaintiffs and respondent, vs. Henry Hancock, defendant and appellant, 1881
Appellant's points and authorities, Henry Hancock, in person for defendant and appellant, Bicknell & White, attorneys for plaintiff and respondent, in the Supreme Court of the State of California.
C. G. W. French, plaintiff, vs. John Hancock, Defendant, 1870
Defendant's brief, Henry Hancock, attorney for defendant, in the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, before Volney E. Howard, judge.
George Wright, appellee, vs. the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, appellant, 1877
Subject of contest, pre-emption claim of appellee, in reply to railroad exceptions to decision of the Hon. Commissioner of the General Land Office, affirming the decision of the local office in favor of Wright.
In the matter of contest between James M. Griffin, and Joseph Wild, 1874
Application for a re-hearing, D. C. Reed and Henry Hancock, attorneys for petitioner, for the N.E. 1-4 of the N.E. 1-4 of Sec. 9, Tp. 11 S., R 4 W., S.B. M., Los Angeles District, California, Hon. Willis Drummond, Commissioner of the General Land Office.
In the Matter of Bertrand Riviere's application to purchase a portion of the rejected lands of the City of Los Angeles, under seventh section of Act of July 23, 1866, 1876
Appendix to exceptions to decision of register & receiver of Los Angeles District, California, published Los Angeles, 1876 (3 copies).
John C. Hayes et al., appellants v. George Martin et al., respondents, 1871
Transcript on appeal, Kewen & Howard, H. C. Rolfe, and Hancock, attorneys for appellants, Howard & Willis, attorneys for respondents, in the Supreme Court of the State of California.