In 1968 the Board of Social Work Examiners was abolished and its funds and functions transferred to the short-lived Social Worker and Marriage Counselor Qualifications Board. In the same year Senate Bill 1224 provided for licensing of clinical social workers, with the designation LCSW required after June 21, 1969 for all clinical social workers in independent practice. Social workers who had earned the RSW administered by the Board of Social Work Examiners were "blanketed" into the LCSW program. Some 1,500 school social workers and others who did not consider their practice to be primarily clinical nevertheless chose to maintain their RSW standing. But the program declined over the next decade and in 1979, when no more than 50 applicants took the RSW examination, the legislature effectively killed social worker registration by denying further funding.
Meanwhile, in 1970, Assembly Bill 2393 created the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners (BBSE) to supersede the Social Worker and Marriage Counselor Qualifications Board. The new, eleven member Board was also responsible for the licensing of educational psychologists. In 1971 the BBSE ceased to operate under the old Board of Professional and Vocational Standards and became a part of the "Healing Arts" division of the State Dept. of Consumer Affairs. This Department oversaw some 38 regulatory bodies which in turn were responsible for over one million occupational licenses. Governor Brown, intent on reducing the size of state government, announced a plan to invoke Sunset laws to end all regulatory boards that could not demonstrate a clear contribution to public welfare and safety.
The papers reflect a period of active reform in the affairs of the BBSE, following events of 1975 when the Governor's office received strong complaints about the Board's administration of its examinations from many candidates, and also from the California Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) and the California Association of Marriage and Family Counselors. Criticism centered on the relevance of the content of written examinations to actual practice, and on the inadequate preparation, unprofessional demeanor, and "consensus" grading practices of Commissioners of the oral examinations. There were also complaints that Commissioners discriminated against applicants on the bases of gender, race, and age, that the examination as a whole was biased in favor of the psychotherapeutic model in clinical social work, and that the Board was unreasonably slow in notifying applicants about their eligibility to take the examination. Dissatisfaction had become so pronounced by 1975 that the oral section of the examination that fall was canceled at the last minute, and delayed indefinitely.
The collection reflects the Board's attempts to rectify the situation, with a major re-organization of its administrative regulations occupying much of 1976, and with training seminars for oral examiners introduced, together with a rule that audiotapes be made of all their examination sessions. The Board had no funds with which to employ outside expertise in the reconfiguration of the LCSW examinations, having always relied on the barely-compensated efforts of experienced social workers and social work educators in the writing of exam questions. Volunteer spirit in these groups was clearly flagging, but the Board did make a concerted effort to improve the relevance of exam questions, holding workshops in their composition and particularly inviting the participation of experienced African-American and Latino social workers.
Members of minority racial groups, by 1976, had begun to complain that they were culturally disadvantaged by the character of the LCSW examinations, and some attempts were made by Board members to investigate this charge of unfairness. But no demographic studies had yet been made of applicants for the examination, so no meaningful analysis could be made of outcomes for differing groups--even if the Board had considered making such analyses, which it evidently did not. Meanwhile the State of California had begun to interest itself in affirmative action programs for its own employees, which included state regulatory boards and their staffs, and in the needs of linguistic minorities in their communications with state government. The Board was evidently startled in 1977 by a question from the Department of Consumer Affairs about its readiness to allow candidates for the LCSW examination to take the test in a language other than English.
While it moved ahead with improvements in its licensing function, and dealt with ongoing concerns in the areas of credentialing, accreditation, discipline and ethics, the Board had also to respond to issues raised in the legislature. For the period represented, major topics included the use of medical hypnosis by clinical social workers, the use of the terms "psychotherapy" and "marriage counseling" in professional advertising, and a new and contested requirement that all licensed social workers take a graduate level course in Human Sexuality. (In searching for an acceptable model, the Board found that many medical schools offered no such instruction to their students.)
The collection reflects fully the activities of the Board in relation to its professional constituency and to the Department of Consumer Affairs, but is revealingly uninformative about the Board's dealing with actual "consumers" in the state of California.